The TV Club, 2013

TV 2013: No Series Explores Class Quite as Crazily as 2 Broke Girls
Talking television.
Dec. 27 2013 10:10 AM

The TV Club, 2013


Entry 7: Why 2 Broke Girls is TV’s best, junkiest show about economic inequality.

Watching 2 Broke Girls is like going to a bullfight: One’s appreciation of the artistry is enhanced by the knowledge that something could go horribly wrong at any moment.

Photo courtesy Darren Michaels/Warner Bros/CBS


Willa Paskin, did you just call Last Tango in Halifax dull? Someone hold my glasses, because them’s fighting words. If true love is tedious, then sure, it was a snoozer, but if there is the slightest bit of romance in your heart, the series was, like actress Sarah Lancashire, quite magnificent.

Nevertheless, I was a bit nervous about putting it on my list, because it’s not exactly cool to confess a passion for PBS programming. (At least not since the early days of Downton Abbey.) Especially a romance involving women of a certain age. But you know what? I also adore Foyle’s War—Christopher Foyle is the finest man I (don’t really) know; I wept when Inspector Lewis got together with Dr. Hobson; and I took a shine to the Inspector Morse prequel Endeavour, even though PBS’s little edits made a dog’s dinner of at least one of the mysteries. These days it’s easier to admit a taste for high art and low thrills than for the gentle geriatric serials that once represented “quality TV” to Americans, but screw it, I hereby affirm my fandom.

June Thomas June Thomas

June Thomas is a Slate culture critic and editor of Outward, Slate’s LGBTQ section. 


And let me disabuse you of another notion: I am by no means “slogging it out” with 2 Broke Girls. That suggests that I find watching the show to be a chore. Quite the opposite. It is a thrill ride. The setup is just so weird: Two Brooklyn diner waitresses in a nonsexual but very co-dependent relationship also run a late-night cupcake outlet and keep a horse in the backyard of their garden apartment. Oh, and as of a few weeks ago, once-wealthy-now-penniless Caroline is also putting always-penniless Max through the Manhattan Pastry School by working in the school’s office. This is American capitalism gone mad!

Watching 2 Broke Girls is like going to a bullfight (another cultural experience that some people find appalling): One’s appreciation of the artistry is enhanced by the knowledge that something could go horribly wrong at any moment. On 2BG, Max and Caroline don’t have to worry about being gored, but the writers do love to torture them. The humiliations are often physical: anal leakage, loss of bladder control, endless wardrobe malfunctions. But they’re also routinely subjected to the kinds of quotidian insults low-wage workers face on a daily basis.

To be sure, the show traffics in cheap humor, and race is definitely part of the mix. I’m uncomfortable when the employees make fun of Han, the diner’s Korean immigrant owner—ribbing that is undoubtedly racialized in that they riff on his small stature and his sexual immaturity. The racial politics are certainly tricky, given that Max and Caroline are the only white, native English-speakers in the diner. Nevertheless, they don’t have that much more power than the old black guy who works the till, the gay Latino waiter, and the sex-crazed Russian short-order cook—so they mouth off at the boss, who happens to be Asian, using harsh words, the only tools at their disposal.

Ach, but I am way over-intellectualizing this junky, imperfect show. Willa, you quoted from “Trash, Art, and the Movies,” so let me do the same. Kael claims, “Patrons of burlesque applaud politely for the graceful erotic dancer but go wild for the lewd lummox who bangs her big hips around.” 2 Broke Girls is the lewd lummox. She never fails to make me ask, “What the hell was that?” But I’m always watching.

OK, this is a smidgey bit inside baseball, but I have a question for the three of you, but mostly for Jim and Mo, since they’ve been writing about television the longest. We’ve all mentioned some aspect of television’s evolving delivery mechanism—all those streaming options and web series—but it seems to me that the culture of television has also undergone an enormous transformation in the last few years. I’m thinking of the way that actors, writers, showrunners, and studio execs hang out on Twitter—building buzz for their shows, being fierce, sometimes alienating people—but also about the way everyone writes so much about shows these days.

This isn’t a new phenomenon, but it doesn’t seem to be going away. In 2013, I wrote weekly analyses of Downton Abbey, The Americans, Breaking Bad, and American Horror Story: Coven. Now, I know my list is the equivalent of a slow night for someone like Alan Sepinwall, but I’m not a full-time TV writer. How has writing weekly reviews and/or recaps changed the way you respond to television—and do you still find them useful? Do we short-change comedies, which rarely get the weekly treatment? Speaking for myself, I judge a show by how well it stands up to really rigorous—or, at least, extensive—analysis, but it can also be exhausting. For example, I can’t even consider reading or writing another word about Breaking Bad, Jim, so I’m going to dodge your question.

Like the BBC, I’m British and commercial-free,




Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 7:23 PM MIT Researchers Are Using Smartphones to Interact With Other Screens
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 11:18 AM A Bridge Across the Sky
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.