RuPaul's All Stars Drag Race

RuPaul’s All Stars Drag Race, Finale recap
Talking television.
Nov. 26 2012 11:35 PM

RuPaul's All Stars Drag Race

VIEW ALL ENTRIES

We have a winnnah! 

121127_TVC_Rupaul_Ep602
Chad Michaels and Raven compete for the crown in RuPaul's All Stars Drag Race.

Logo

Every week in Slate’s RuPaul’s All Stars Drag Race TV Club, J. Bryan Lowder will have an IM conversation with a different RuPaul fan after the losing contestants have sashayed away. This week, he finishes where things began, in a kiki about the finale episode with Jeffery Bloomer, SlateV’s blogger/editor.

J. Bryan Lowder: Well, well, that's a wrap Mr. Bloomer. The first, brief season of All-Stars has come to an end, and we have for our queen the poised and "practiced" Chad Michaels. I have to say, all in all, I'm pretty satisfied with that result. But I'm all tuckeled up for your take.

Jeff Bloomer: Well, Chad Michaels has been acting like she won since the beginning, so I suppose I'm happy for her—the senior queen finally got her crown. I told you after the premiere that I just wanted to see her run out, but Chad asserted herself to the top since that first lip sync, and I can only be fair and say she earned it. Still: Am I wrong that the only surprise of that finale was that Ru actually picked a winner? I wasn't hoping for another wicked gimmick, but this still ends as a shoulder-shrug for me.

Lowder: You know, I do agree that this FINALE was a little whimpering for my money. I mean, this was meant to be THE ALL STAR, equal in talent (or at least portrait placement) to RuPaul herself. But a shrug was about the level of energy involved, yes. As for the question of Chad's deserving to win, I felt like watching her tonight, you just couldn't give it to anyone else. She was funny, put-together, stylish and, surprisingly, kind of fresh. The other queens just didn't have a chance—especially when poor, dufus-scored Shannel looked like a fracking lobster up there on the main stage. This ain’t the Mermaid parade, honey.

Bloomer: I don't even know what to say about the final looks. Shannel's red-bombed Ursula getup certainly got an exasperated sigh out of my crew over here, but nobody was especially remarkable, not even Chad's sleek bodysuit. The girls were themselves, I suppose, but I was expecting to laugh. I did not.

Lowder: That's fair—though I have to say I was really feeling Chad's sticking with asymmetrically weighted wigs this evening. They work for her—something about them smoothes out the Cher implant face. But since you bring up laughs, let's speak for a minute on the comedy portion. I thought Cheri Oteri did a fine job as the shady coach, but did you genuinely find any of the resulting routines funny? Shannel was downright racist, Juju stole the Margaret Cho routine, and the others weren't that great either. And, of course, one might ask whether we should expect queen to be standup comediennes in the first place…

Bloomer: I agree. Juju did Asian jokes. Chad did Mexican jokes. Shannel did black jokes (I think?). But I thought Raven brought something raw, if a little sad, to her bit—a mordant, very dark take on I-can't-get-any humor that had a surprisingly bracing edge for me. As to the question of whether the challenge made sense at all, I confess that is outside my expertise—but it's certainly better than chasing people around with trash from an L.A. dumpster.

Lowder: This is true. Of course, I expect my queens to be proficient at humorous banter, but I'm not sure about a full-on routine. But then again, I expect kick splits as a matter of course, so we all have our preferences.

Bloomer: But to challenge your take on the night a little bit: Is it possible Raven really lost during the lip sync? I thought she had a shot in those final moments, which I didn't really before the episode. Wishful thinking?

Lowder: Hmm, that's a good question. I definitely thought Chad had it going into the final portion of the episode, but I do think Raven gave a fine interpretation of "Responsitrannity." The only misstep I detected was her choice of roboting that one synth break. If I'm not mistaken, Santino and I recoiled at that obvious crassness in unison; however, I'm not sure that made much of a difference

Bloomer: I think everyone cringed in unison. What the hell was that? She had a good thing going in the beginning, but before long she was rolling on the ground and taking obvious miscues on the moment. By the end, even I had to concede it.

Lowder: Well, given all the criticism that's been printed here and abroad, I'm wondering of RuCo will concede that the teams gimmick was a bad one. My crew and I remarked tonight that the only reason Miss Shannel was still here in top four land was because of those stupid teams. She was clearly not on the same level as the other three. I'd much rather have seen Manila up there, or, though I've soured on her a bit, Latrice. I remember your not being a fan at the beginning either...

Bloomer: You know, I thought it might work in the beginning, but I quickly soured on it. It gave the whole proceeding an arbitrary sheen—most of the time, the losses were clearly caused by one girl and not her partner, and it just seemed like such an unfair grind. By the time we got to this week, the four who were left didn't have with any sense of triumph.

And so far, I have to say we are some sour bitches. Was there anything the finale of this abbreviated go-around gave us, other than bizarre trailers for the next full season in January?

Lowder: Ha, so we have been. Well, I did enjoy watching a bunch of queens trying to get ready in a moving van—seems only slightly better than the area in which the queens get ready in my local dive bar—the basement food storage area of the adjacent roti place. But your point raises a final question: Was this little mini season worth it? I mean, I was generally entertained, I guess, but I'm not sure felt it was as edifying as a regular season. Maybe we thirst for fresh tea? I'm not sure...

Bloomer: Right you are. If this format is revived, just go all out and bring back previous winners—reputations are on the line, I suppose, but so is $100,000. Not to mention that "one-of-a-kind," still-unnamed vacation.

Lowder: That format sounds appealing, as does that vacation. But for now, this queen is going to take off her crown and slide into bed for a long winter's nap—till Season V in January. See you then?

Bloomer: The lounge awaits!

Tomorrow: What other writers and Slate commenters thought about Episode 6

J. Bryan Lowder is a Slate assistant editor. He writes and edits for Outward, Slate’s LGBTQ section, and for the culture section.

Jeffrey Bloomer is a Slate Video assistant editor. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

History

Slate Plus Early Read: The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.

Mitt Romney May Be Weighing a 2016 Run. That Would Be a Big Mistake.

Amazing Photos From Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution

Transparent Is the Fall’s Only Great New Show

The XX Factor

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada

Now, journalists can't even say her name.

Doublex

Lena Dunham, the Book

More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.

What a Juicy New Book About Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric Fails to Tell Us About the TV News Business

Does Your Child Have Sluggish Cognitive Tempo? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?

  News & Politics
Foreigners
Sept. 29 2014 10:00 PM “Everything Must Change in Italy” An interview with Italian Prime Minster Matteo Renzi.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 29 2014 7:01 PM We May Never Know If Larry Ellison Flew a Fighter Jet Under the Golden Gate Bridge
  Life
Dear Prudence
Sept. 29 2014 3:10 PM The Lonely Teetotaler Prudie counsels a letter writer who doesn’t drink alcohol—and is constantly harassed by others for it.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 29 2014 1:52 PM Do Not Fear California’s New Affirmative Consent Law
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 29 2014 8:45 AM Slate Isn’t Too Liberal, but … What readers said about the magazine’s bias and balance.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 29 2014 9:06 PM Paul Thomas Anderson’s Inherent Vice Looks Like a Comic Masterpiece
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 29 2014 11:56 PM Innovation Starvation, the Next Generation Humankind has lots of great ideas for the future. We need people to carry them out.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 29 2014 12:01 PM This Is Your MOM’s Mars
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.