The Movie Club

Trash Humpers and the Importance of WTF? Picks
Critic vs. critic.
Jan. 3 2011 3:56 PM

The Movie Club

VIEW ALL ENTRIES

Still from Trash Humpers. Click image to expand.
Trash Humpers

Hello Movie Clubbers,

I guess it was inevitable that I would become the Trash Humpers Girl. I reiterate—only because it's become something of an issue online since my list was published—that it's a completely sincere choice.

Advertisement

That said, of course part of the fun of choosing Harmony Korine's barely released, banned-by-Netflix, shot-on-VHS (!) provocation as my film of the year was knowing that it wouldn't be a common choice and hoping that it would start a conversation. Not very long ago, before I was professionally mandated to create year-end top-10 lists and was purely a reader of them, I lived for the whiplash-inducing WTF? choices of a Hoberman or a Nathan Lee, picks that would force me to re-evaluate a film that I hadn't previously considered world-beating. And Trash Humpers is a film that I adamantly believe deserves to be part of some kind of canon, even if it'll never appeal to even a fraction of the audience reeled in by many of the year's zeitgeist-defining consensus choices. At the very least, it's not a dismissible prank or a lark. It is, in its own way, both special effects epic and costume drama, hyper-niche porn and staged, simulated snuff film—but what blockbuster isn't? Within that trendy subgenre of quasi-documentaries, Trash Humpers offered a rare aesthetic sense of purpose (and when it comes to fiction films that engage in what Dana referred to as "cinematic chain-yanking," its most striking images are more uncannily dreamlike, or at least nightmarelike, than a lot of Inception). At the same time, it's not just a formal experiment—I find it truly satisfying emotionally and dramatically. Of all the 2010 films to stumble over the "really real" question, for me Trash Humpers most powerfully revealed that question's ultimate irrelevance. And it's funny!

Now on to the other commercial and artistic extreme: As Dan noted, I've been calling How Do You Know my No. 11. I had to file my list a few days before they screened it here; I don't know if the movie would have replaced anything on my top 10, but I think it's a really special film, and I'm frankly not surprised that the public seems totally uninterested in it. As commercial product, it just doesn't work. I reviewed most of the year's studio rom-coms, and, in its defiant tonal chaos, How Do You Know exposes the extent to which the genre has become completely, well, generic. It operates on an internal rhythm and logic that's fully its own. And that Paul Rudd performance is phenomenal—splitting the difference between Albert Brooks and Jack Lemmon, his authentically troubled sad-sack heartthrob is an important corrective to contemporary romance's parade of loveable schlubs and pretty vacant boys. It made me cry, and not in a way that made me hate myself for doing so (see: Eat, Pray, Love). Sony, here's my pull quote: "It's the most convincing Hollywood romance since the advent of bromance."

As for the rest of my top 10, I'll let Stephanie tackle Somewhere––a film I really fell for but have already defended at length. I would love to hear from the rest of you as to what would have made your top 11-20. Depending on the day, mine would likely include Carlos, And Everything Is Going Fine, Disco and Atomic War, Lourdes, Life During Wartime, and—for pure escapist pleasure—Jackass 3-D, Piranha 3-D, and Tron: Legacy. And, yeah, I'm being sincere about that, too.

Love and other drugs,
Karina

Karina Longworth is the creator/host of You Must Remember This, a podcast about the secret/forgotten history of Hollywood's first century. She is the author of books about George Lucas, Al Pacino and Meryl Streep, and has contributed to LA Weekly, the Guardian, NPR, Vulture, and other publications.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 8:15 AM Ted Cruz Will Not Join a Protest of "The Death of Klinghoffer" After All
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 8:27 AM Only Science Fiction Can Save Us! What sci-fi gets wrong about income inequality.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 7:30 AM Ring Around the Rainbow
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.