What Are Journalists For?

Hits and Misses
New books dissected over email.
Jan. 4 2000 1:13 PM

What Are Journalists For?

VIEW ALL ENTRIES

Dear Jack,

Advertisement

I'm glad you picked up on the alternative newspaper question, for two reasons. One, it spotlights the frustrating limits of Rosen's definitions of journalism and journalists. There is nary a mention in this thick book of any of the leading "alternative" weeklies, which are often stuffed with material that one might expect to intrigue Rosen. There's also little mention of national magazines, whether specialized political ones or big general-interest ones. There's almost no attention paid to radio, where hundreds of of excellent American journalists work, and only at the end does Rosen acknowledge the development of the Internet as a news medium. Even television doesn't get much play here, at least not compared with the audience it garners in real life. In other words: For someone with as sweeping and academic-seeming a criticism as Rosen's, he's done a poor job of defining the terms of what journalists do, where they work, and how they operate.

Two, as you indicate, "alternative" newspapers have been thriving, many for decades, by providing readers with exactly the kind of service Rosen says he wants: reporting with perspective; reader inclusion; making stories into crusades; etc. Their "success" in doing so is of course debatable, but it makes you wonder: Has Rosen simply never read those papers? Or is he avoiding using them as models? My guess is the latter. I'll bet it's a prestige problem. The folks at Pew Charitable Trust and the other purse strings of public journalism would scream: "We didn't cough up several million dollars so you could tell the media to behave like the goddamned Village Voice."

That said, I think you're being awfully sanguine about the state of American media. I find most American newspapers to be quite bad; to argue that they might once have been worse is neither reassuring nor really the point. Most television journalism is horrendous, and some is actually harmful (by misinforming viewers about crime, for example). Either you want that situation to change or you don't, but denying it seems silly.

You're also arguing against straw men of your own creation: A journalist does not need to have a "lunch-pail and straphanger" audience in order to be out of touch. Pick up a copy of the Miami Herald (or, for that matter, the San Francisco Chronicle), and tell me with a straight face that those papers are doing the best job they can to reflect and report life in those cities. Remind me which prime-time network news show it is that deals with immigration, public education, workplace discrimination, and how to solve health and child-care problems. Seems to me that whenever I tune in I am asked to contemplate "The Miracle of Sextuplets."

As for presidential politics, we agree that poor coverage is not exclusively the media's fault, or even principally its fault. But it also seems a cop-out to say that if the candidates don't disagree, then there's no way to cover the issues. I don't think that some of the experiments in this book are all that bad for that kind of coverage. That is, start with local issues; in my neighborhood, they include AIDS, homelessness, housing prices, and the need for a Second Avenue subway. Then look to what candidates can offer (skeptically, of course, since the real story may be that these problems elude solutions on the presidential level). If they don't disagree one iota, then maybe there's a political problem, but I don't think there would be a problem producing good or interesting journalism. I suspect, by the way, that the better New York papers will do something like this as the primary approaches, though they won't call it public journalism.

leftyesspacer/Slate247/000103_Journalists.jpghttp://img.slate.com/mediafalseWhat Are Journalists For? by Jay Rosen20111

21
103158AMFridayJanJanuary101/21/2011 3:31:58 PM63431202718603277320111
21
103158AMFridayJanJanuary101/21/2011 3:31:58 PM634312027186032773
20111
21
103158AMFridayJanJanuary101/21/2011 3:31:58 PM634312027186032773
Pfalse200110
19
31103AMFridayOctOctober310/19/2001 7:11:03 AM631390578630000000
200110
19
31103AMFridayOctOctober310/19/2001 7:11:03 AM631390578630000000
This week, a discussion of Jay Rosen's
What Are Journalists For? (click here to buy it). James Ledbetter is the New York bureau chief of theIndustry Standard. Jack Shafer is the deputy editor of Slate.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Talking White

Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.

Hong Kong’s Protesters Are Ridiculously Polite. That’s What Scares Beijing So Much.

The One Fact About Ebola That Should Calm You: It Spreads Slowly

Operation Backbone

How White Boy Rick, a legendary Detroit cocaine dealer, helped the FBI uncover brazen police corruption.

A Jaw-Dropping Political Ad Aimed at Young Women, Apparently

The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 4:05 PM Today in GOP Outreach to Women: You Broads Like Wedding Dresses, Right?
Music

How Even an Old Hipster Can Age Gracefully

On their new albums, Leonard Cohen, Robert Plant, and Loudon Wainwright III show three ways.

How Tattoo Parlors Became the Barber Shops of Hipster Neighborhoods

This Gargantuan Wind Farm in Wyoming Would Be the Hoover Dam of the 21st Century

Moneybox
Oct. 1 2014 8:34 AM This Gargantuan Wind Farm in Wyoming Would Be the Hoover Dam of the 21st Century To undertake a massively ambitious energy project, you don’t need the government anymore.
  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 1 2014 7:26 PM Talking White Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.
  Business
Buy a Small Business
Oct. 1 2014 11:48 PM Inking the Deal Why tattoo parlors are a great small-business bet.
  Life
Outward
Oct. 1 2014 6:02 PM Facebook Relaxes Its “Real Name” Policy; Drag Queens Celebrate
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 5:11 PM Celebrity Feminist Identification Has Reached Peak Meaninglessness
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 1 2014 3:24 PM Revelry (and Business) at Mohonk Photos and highlights from Slate’s annual retreat.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 9:39 PM Tom Cruise Dies Over and Over Again in This Edge of Tomorrow Supercut
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 6:59 PM EU’s Next Digital Commissioner Thinks Keeping Nude Celeb Photos in the Cloud Is “Stupid”
  Health & Science
Science
Oct. 1 2014 4:03 PM Does the Earth Really Have a “Hum”? Yes, but probably not the one you’re thinking.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 1 2014 5:19 PM Bunt-a-Palooza! How bad was the Kansas City Royals’ bunt-all-the-time strategy in the American League wild-card game?