Kitty Pryde Has Some Notes on the New X-Men Movie

Reviews of the latest films.
May 23 2014 8:08 AM

Why Is Wolverine Doing All the Stuff I Already Did?

Kitty Pryde has some notes on the new X-Men movie.

(Continued from Page 1)

Now the movie did got some parts of the X-Men just right. For example, Professor Xavier is a jerk! When we meet him the young Xavier (James McAvoy) is not a teacher but a decadent, drug-dependent, failed rock star dude, after the end of his first team (from X-Men: First Class) and before he assembled his second (the one I came in with). He’s addicted to an injectable drug that lets him walk, but inhibits his telepathy: He can live as an ordinary human being, or he can use the powers that set him apart, but he can’t do both. That’s a very X-Men idea, and Xavier’s self-important anguish over it—later to be transformed into teacherly lecturing about mutant responsibility—is right on. Also right on is Hugh Jackman as Wolverine: His gruff sarcasm aces the Logan I know, and it’s not his fault that you guys gave him my job. Your Quicksilver isn’t the superfast mutant I’ve met, but he’s maybe actually better: He’s the kind of who-cares stoner teen who used to get on my nerves in middle school—I don’t think he’s done a page of homework in his life—and it’s amazing that Logan can work with him at all.

140522_MOV_KittyPryde-still
Kitty Pryde, played by Ellen Page in the new X-Men movie, second from left.

© 2013 - Marvel/Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Trouble is, the prison break with Wolverine and Quicksilver was pretty much the last part of the movie that felt very much, to me, like the X-Men I know. As I walked out through the theater wall after the credits (I was not showing off; I was letting the others leave faster!) I kept trying to figure out why all those scenes of the 1973 X-Men felt so wrong (besides, of course, that Wolvie was doing what I had done). Part of the problem was that the X-Men of 1973—the ones in the film—aren’t representative: not in who they are (just Xavier, Beast and Wolverine for most of it), and not in what they do.

The stories about us written by Chris Claremont in the late 1970s and early 1980s were some of the first mainstream comics that had more than one female character at a time, with lines and powers and motives and everything. The movie, on the other hand, doesn’t even try to pass the Bechdel test. Its 1973 plot has one woman, Mystique, the third in a classic bromantic triangle with Xavier and Magneto. The 1973 plot—that’s most of the movie—also has one non-white speaking role, a Vietnamese officer whom Mystique kills and impersonates. The future looks terrible (and grey and cloudy—why do all dystopias look grey and cloudy?) but at least it’s diverse: Storm and Bishop, Blink and Warpath, tear up the screen.

Advertisement

But my problem with Days is not just that its historical past (like the real past) is mostly run by white guys. (OK, Beast is sometimes a blue guy, but you get my point.) Nor is my problem that Ellen Page gets so little to say. It’s that the X-Men should be a team. We quarrel but we learn to work together, and we learn to fight together, even when we hate each other’s guts. All our cool moves, when we battle the bad guys, are team moves, as the X-Men X-perts Rachel Edidin and Miles Stokes have explained (check out their podcast). The X-Men believe in cooperation, among individuals, among social groups (we even work with supervillains), and across species. (Lockheed feels the same way.)

And cooperation—teamwork—isn’t enough in evidence in 1973, where most of the movie takes place.  When future-me and Storm and Colossus and Bishop and Blink fight the good fight in the bleak future, we work together; our best moves are team moves. But for most of the rest of the film, there’s not enough teamwork on display. Our heroes take on bad guys one by one, or one on one, shot by shot, even when they’re fighting in the same place. And most of the talk isolates the characters too: Logan persuades Charles, and then Charles must persuade Mystique, to do the right thing. I know that Mystique has a big decision to make—in a way, the 1973 story is about her, but it’s also about how two powerful guys won’t stop telling her what to do. I guess that’s part of being an X-Man too. It’s not like Professor X never gave us instructions. But it’s not exactly my favorite part.

I’m a teacher—at the moment, in the comics, I’m running a school—so maybe I’m just too alert to classroom dynamics. But it seems to me that if you can get students to work together, you should; if you can represent the X-Men as a team— and not just as a few fierce white guys, squaring off one at a time, one on one—you probably should. That’s what the Xavier of Days is still learning; I hope the next screenwriters who tell our stories learn it too.

For the non-mutant’s take on X-Men: Days of Future Past, read Dana Stevens’ review.

Stephen Burt is a poet and critic and a professor of English at Harvard.

  Slate Plus
Working
Dec. 18 2014 4:49 PM Slate’s Working Podcast: Episode 17 Transcript Read what David Plotz asked a middle school principal about his workday.