Kembrew McLeod’s Pranksters, reviewed.

P.T. Barnum, Ben Franklin, Steve Jobs, Abbie Hoffman: A History of Pranksters

P.T. Barnum, Ben Franklin, Steve Jobs, Abbie Hoffman: A History of Pranksters

Reading between the lines.
May 8 2014 6:00 PM


A history of pranksters, hackers, and mischief-makers.

Illustration by Chip Zdarsky.

Illustration by Chip Zdarsky

The year: 1614. A strangely compelling piece of writing emerges in Germany, putting forth the Fama Fraternitatis Rosae Crucis—the “Fame of the Brotherhood of the Rose Cross.” Though several of Rosicrucians’ claims are dubious, to say the least, the movement gains steam among prominent thinkers and leaders. “These documents claimed that the Brothers of the Rose Cross were engineering a coming Golden Age that would transform all existing political and religious institutions,” writes Kembrew McLeod in his new book Pranksters: Making Mischief in the Modern World. “Not only could these men bring about global utopian harmony; they could make themselves disappear! Readers who wanted to meet a Brother were told that if they concentrated really, really hard, one would probably drop by for a visit.”

The Rosicrucians are among the earliest pranksters discussed in McLeod’s entertaining book, which starts with the age of Enlightenment and covers four centuries at a breakneck pace. There are appearances from Jonathan Swift, P.T. Barnum, the Merry Pranksters, Steve Jobs, ACT UP, and the Yes Men, for starters. “If reduced to a mathematical formula, the art of pranking can be expressed as Performance Art + Satire x Media = Prank,” McLeod writes. “Put simply, pranks are playful critiques performed within the public sphere and amplified by media.”


Much of McLeod’s book centers on American history. Benjamin Franklin, to give one example, was a notorious prankster—and a bit of a troll. In the 1730s, Franklin used his Poor Richard's Almanack as a platform to heckle an astrologer named Titan Leeds. Franklin detested Leeds' pseudoscientific claptrap, and Leeds was a business competitor, which only compounded Franklin's ire. Franklin repeatedly predicted Leeds' death in the Almanack, lampooning astrology and taking aim at Leeds in increasingly specific ways. Leeds would perish on Oct. 17, 1733, at 3:29 p.m., according to one of Franklin's predictions. In further editions of the Almanack, though Leeds was still among the living, Franklin hopefully initiated a discussion with his ghost. After Leeds finally died in 1738, Franklin continued the onslaught, which went on for several years beyond the grave. “The 1740 edition of Poor Richard's Almanack described a late-night visit from the Ghost of Titan Leeds, who entered Richard Saunders's brain via his left nostril,” writes McLeod.


McLeod, a professor at the University of Iowa, is best known for his numerous books on the intersection of copyright and culture. (I interviewed McLeod for an article in Slate on De La Soul.) As a scholar, McLeod is smart and incisive, but better yet, he’s funny—a relatively rare trait among academics. In all of his books, McLeod shows a soft spot for artists, musicians, underdogs, and weirdos with a healthy disrespect for authority—the ones who, in some small way, attempt to stick it to the Man.

Pranksters is the logical extension of McLeod’s previous books, which examined the lunacy of hyperaggressive copyright and intellectual property litigation. McLeod’s first book, Freedom of Expression, had a prank at its heart—his successful attempt to trademark the term freedom of expression in 1998. “My quiet little joke went public after I hired a lawyer who threatened to sue AT&T for using this iconic phrase in an ad without permission!” McLeod writes in Pranksters. “In 2003, the New York Times broke the story with a wry article that began, ‘Freedom of expression, it turns out, may not be for everyone.’ When wire services picked it up, more reporters came calling. This gave me a platform to say ridiculous, provocative things such as ‘I didn’t go through the time, effort and expense of trademarking freedom of expression just to have people use it whenever they want.’ ”

I read Pranksters with particular interest, being a veteran of various pranks myself. I went to college at MIT about 15 years ago, where I befriended a ragtag group of hackers and rabble-rousers. My fellow students included people who hacked computers for fun, explored the underground network of tunnels under campus, and architected some of the first hoaxes on the World Wide Web. (Many of these folks went on to lead successful companies, become professors, and shape the world in various meaningful ways.) It’s safe to say that I wouldn’t be a journalist today if I hadn’t had these experiences as a teenager. Designing and implementing an elaborate prank—or a “hack,” to use the MIT parlance—was a unique education you just couldn’t get in a lecture hall.