With his passion for amateur academia (his previous essay collection, The Size of Thoughts, featured a 150-page piece tracing the genealogy of the word “lumber”), Baker was bound to fall for Wikipedia. He begins making small edits to a few articles. After a week, he finds his true calling: saving articles flagged for possible deletion. He discovers that two users have voted to remove an entry on Richard Denner, an obscure American post-Beat poet deemed not a “notable figure.” Against these “deletionists” Baker adopts an “inclusionist” philosophy, bulking the article up with quotes from newspaper interviews and voting “keep” on the page where administrators decide the fate of threatened articles. The page was axed.
Soon Baker finds himself constantly polishing up at-risk articles (a South Korean textile company, a San Diego neuroscientist, a “Cyprio-Turkish crime family based in London”), bestowing them with the protective armor of additional quotes and citations. “All of these people and things had been deemed nonnotable by other editors, sometimes with unthinking harshness,” Baker writes. “When I managed to help save something I was quietly thrilled—I walked tall, like Henry Fonda in 12 Angry Men.” (He can walk even taller when he learns that the page for poor Richard Denner has since been resurrected.)
That same instinct for preservation underpins the way Baker writes. Ever since his first essays and stories appeared in the early ‘80s, he has always been noting things deemed non-notable by others, gently urging them towards us with his precise, delightful language. His style is deeply moral—not in a preachy sense, but in the sense that it emerges from the way he sees the world. His ethics are absorbed into his aesthetics, and vice versa.
In all this there is the flavor of one of Baker’s favorite authors, Iris Murdoch, who centered her moral philosophy on the idea of “loving attention”—the idea that looking at a person or situation with intense care and imaginative sympathy is, in her words, “the characteristic and proper mark of the moral agent.” The lovingly precise descriptions Baker offers of even the most fleeting things that he comes across are a way of doing justice to those things—of honoring their dignity, if that’s not too grand and religious-sounding a phrase to use. (Baker is an atheist, and also a pacifist.)
But the scope of Baker’s attention is far wider than Murdoch’s—extending beyond living things to sights, sounds, books, newspapers, Web pages, even idle thoughts. “I want each sequential change of mind in its true, knotted, clotted, viny multifariousness, with all of the colorful streamers of intelligence still taped on,” he wrote in an early essay, “Changes of Mind.”
No other writer is so handy with a simile. The tails of groundhogs look “like the handles of Revere saucepans.” Words printed on a piece of white paper are composed of “sharp black letters laid out like lacquered chopsticks on a clean tablecloth.” A book’s page “rises up slightly toward the inside margin and then veers south into the binding, like a mounding wave.” Like a wave is nothing special. Like a mounding wave is the thing exactly.
But all this attention can also be a bit wearying for the reader, especially if you’re reading the book cover to cover. Descriptions become ends in themselves, as Baker splashes around happily in the English language, looking for new and amusing ways to bring his subjects to life. This is all fine and good in a short essay about spending a Sunday at the dump, but patience-sapping in a many-thousand word piece on gondolas which gazes so lovingly at these boats that it never looks beyond them. Where many great essays approach their real subject sideways (Montaigne’s essay On Cannibals, say, is sort of about cannibals, but really it’s about cultural relativism), Baker often ends up writing about exactly the thing he’s writing about. In his essay on violent videogames, we learn that Uncharted 2 is better than God of War III and that Assassin’s Creed II is worth checking out if you’re into virtual neck-stabbing, but in the end we don’t discover much more than that. The larger ideas that a pacifist entering the world of violent videogames might want to explore are noted and then briskly set aside.
But a book like this isn't meant to be read from Page 1 to Page 314, and when your own attention starts to lag, you can always just skip on to a different essay. Or even put the book down for a little while. Check your email maybe, or cook some food, or take a walk. Notice a few things. Look.
The Way the World Works: Essays by Nicholson Baker. Simon & Schuster.
TODAY IN SLATE
Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS
But the next president might.
The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices
Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.
The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything
It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.
How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?
Here are the facts.
The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender
What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?